Catcher in the Eye |
||
|
He is not
just another outstanding cinematographer from Kerala. With such celebrated
films as Train to Pakistan (Pamela
Rooks), Mankamma (T. V. Chandran), Kahni
(Mala Bhattacharya), Vasthuhara (G.
Aravindan), Piravi (Shaji N. Karun),
and Sanabi (Aribam Syam Sarma) to
his credit, despite having been ignored by the film juries, he has always
remained in the limelight. A fact that was reiterated at the International
Film Festival of Kerala-’98, held last month in Thiruvananthapuram, where he
was the most sought-after cameraman and became the focus of attraction for
foreign delegates. Sunny
Joseph has certainly hit the big time. Consider this: international filmmakers
of the order of Vladimir Levin (Russia), Michael Heath (New Zealand), and
Prasanna Vithanayage (Sri Lanka) have all chosen Sunny as their lenseman. And,
perhaps for the first time for an Indian, Sunny has been invited by Polish
maestro Krzystof Zanussi to assist him in his next venture, scheduled to take
off in Poland later this year. Sunny has
come a long way from his FTII (Film and Television Institute of India) days
– he graduated in 1983 – where his passion for the camera was manifest in
the documentaries he shot in 16 mm. Sunny says he owes it to the late
Malayalam director G. Aravindan who inspired him to join FTII in the first
place. Then Sunny
went to the sets of Chidambaram, the
Smita Patil-starrer, to assist Aravindan. The film’s cameraman, Shaji N.
Karun, was in search of an assistant. That was when Sunny got his professional
break. But for
the man who won the national award for best experimental film in 1984, making
films remains the primary passion. And at present, he is engrossed in
scripting his maiden directorial venture, which is based on Marubhoomikal
Undakunnathu, a landmark novel by the Delhi-based Sahitya Akademi
award-winning Malayalam novelist Anand. But the film will be in Hindi as the
novel is situated in Rajasthan. Sunny says
he makes sure he chooses films, which are in tune with his taste.
“Photography should be transparent,” he says. “It should reveal the
internal essence of cinema without obstructing the interaction of characters
and narration. You should not feel the lighting. Today, light falls so heavily
on the viewer. That is part of the glamorization and commercialization of
photography. Cinematography should be an element adhering to the visual
language, to the philosophy of the director.” What
distinguishes this affable, introspective cinematographer from the rest of his
tribe is the deep spin his attitude towards life and art. He says he
approaches work with the basic philosophy that good films should be pro-life.
“Life is a precious chance where we can use our faculties to create film,
music, and paintings. I’m not a moralist. But I am bothered about the value
system established by the work. If it asks people to accept the present
system, I cannot associate with it. It should be creative and progressive,”
he says. He is all
for the advances in imaging technology, though, for he says these only enhance
the depiction of reality. “Sixty-five to 70 per cent of our knowledge of the
world comes from visuals,” he says. And that, he feels, confers an important
responsibility on the cameraman. “The experience and meaning of the world
will be redefined by the images. And as a practitioner of imaging I have a
responsibility. As Zen Buddhism says: ‘We are trying to reveal the suchness
of things’. I also wish to do that through my work.” Though he
was born a Christian, Sunny is a firm Zen Buddhist. Says, he: “I am against
two major concepts of Christianity. One is that of salvation is possible only
through Jesus. The other is the concept of Pope –one individual being the
representative of God.” Perhaps
his vision best illustrates the rapport between him and Zanussi. Their
association flowered after Piravi, screened at about 44 film festivals around
the world and winner of the Charlie Chaplin award at the Edinburgh festival in
1989 where Zanussi was chairing the jury. Zanussi’s
views on Marxism are unabashed but Sunny prefers to disagree with the Left’s
cultural czars – though he has always voted for the Communists. “I will
vote for the Communists. But that doesn’t deter me from lending an ear to
Zanussi who seems to have rediscovered Christianity. I have also not forgotten
Zanussi’s past and his quest of the mystical. Individuals, like nations,
also go through stages of transformation. He might be passing through one such
stage. “ He says
the two domains of communism and religion are entirely different. And that
dialogue would be impossible if the participants in the debate took extreme
postures. “We are talking of the need to resist the homogenization of
cultures by globalization. But by being unwilling to accommodate rival
ideologies we are also sustaining this kind of culture,” he says. He adds: “God can be all powerful. But then our feeling
towards Him will be similar to the fear of a dictator. The mystery surrounding
God has only enhanced the individual’s freedom to do right and wrong. It
also intensifies one’s responsibility to do the right thing. Only then will
love and sacrifice emerge.” For the
moment, it seems, the consensus is that Sunny can do no wrong. The Indian Express Sunday Magazine 31 May 1998 |
||
Last
updated/modified on April 17, 2001. ©2000-2001 H Shaji. All rights reserved.
Contact
Me.